Operation Sindoor: India’s Bold Response to Pakistan-Sponsored Terrorism
Operation Sindoor marked a pivotal moment in the longstanding India-Pakistan rivalry, showcasing India’s evolved military strategy against cross-border terrorism. Launched in May 2025, Operation Sindoor was India’s punitive response to a deadly terrorist attack, escalating into a brief but intense four-day conflict. This article details the events from the background tensions to the resolution, highlighting the strategic shifts and implications of Operation Sindoor.
| Read More | Mahatma Gandhi: The Architect of India’s Freedom |
| Read More | Jan Suraj “Bihar’s Silent Revolution |
Operation Sindoor: Background of India-Pakistan Tensions
The roots of the 2025 India-Pakistan conflict trace back to the partition of British India in 1947, with the Kashmir region remaining a flashpoint. Multiple wars (1947, 1965, 1971, 1999) and ongoing insurgencies have fueled animosity, particularly over allegations of Pakistan supporting terrorist groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) operating in Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir. These groups have been linked to major attacks, including the 2008 Mumbai bombings and the 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing, which prompted India’s previous airstrike at Balakot.
In the lead-up to Operation Sindoor, tensions simmered with protests in Pakistan-administered Kashmir against India, including an anti-India rally in Muzaffarabad on April 26, 2025, demanding a UN probe into alleged Indian atrocities. Local fears in Pakistan of Indian retaliation grew, as reported by international media. India’s revocation of Article 370 in 2019, integrating Jammu and Kashmir fully into India, had already heightened cross-border skirmishes, setting the stage for escalation.
Operation Sindoor:The Indus Waters Treaty Dispute
On April 23, 2025, following the triggering attack, India placed the Indus Waters Treaty “in abeyance,” signaling potential water diversion as leverage against Pakistan. Pakistan responded on April 24, declaring any such action an act of war, further inflaming diplomatic relations. This move underscored India’s willingness to use non-military tools in conjunction with future operations like Operation Sindoor.
The Triggering Event: Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
The immediate catalyst for Operation Sindoor was the horrific terrorist attack on April 22, 2025, in Pahalgam, a scenic tourist spot in Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir. Gunmen targeted a group of mostly Hindu tourists, killing 26 civilians—all men—in a brazen assault. Survivors reported the attackers shouting Islamic slogans and selectively targeting Hindus, amplifying communal tensions.
The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of LeT, initially claimed responsibility via social media but later denied it, attributing the post to a hack. India swiftly blamed Pakistan-sponsored groups like LeT and JeM, accusing Islamabad of harboring terrorists. Pakistan denied involvement, condemning the attack but rejecting any links. The incident shocked India, leading to widespread protests and calls for retaliation, reminiscent of the Pulwama attack in 2019.
International Condemnations and Domestic Pressure
World leaders, including U.S. President Donald Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and others, condemned the Pahalgam attack. In India, Prime Minister Narendra Modi faced immense pressure to respond decisively, vowing that such acts would not go unpunished. This public outrage paved the way for Operation Sindoor.
Launch of Operation Sindoor
On May 7, 2025 (with some reports indicating strikes began around midnight on May 6), India initiated Operation Sindoor, a tri-services operation named by PM Modi, symbolizing a “red line” against terrorism. The operation involved precision missile and air strikes on nine terrorist-linked sites: five in Pakistan-administered Kashmir (Muzaffarabad, Kotli, Bhimber) and four in Punjab, Pakistan (Muridke, Bahawalpur, Sialkot, Shakar Garh).
Operation Sindoor: Targets and Weapons Used
Targets included headquarters and camps of LeT and JeM, such as Markaz Taiba in Muridke (linked to the 2008 Mumbai attacks), Markaz Subhanallah in Bahawalpur, and various camps near the Line of Control (LoC). Strikes hit mosques and seminaries allegedly used as terror hubs, with India claiming to have destroyed 21 terror camps and killed over 100 terrorists.
Weapons deployed showcased India’s advanced arsenal: BrahMos cruise missiles (co-developed with Russia), SCALP-EG cruise missiles from Rafale jets, HAMMER glide bombs, and drone-delivered munitions. The Indian Air Force (IAF) used indigenously developed Akash missiles and the S-400 system for defense. The Indian Navy deployed Carrier Battle Groups for maritime surveillance, while the Army countered infiltrations.
India emphasized calibrated force, avoiding military or civilian targets to prevent full-scale war. However, Pakistan reported 40 civilian deaths, including children, and damage to mosques.
Initial Pakistani Response
Pakistan condemned Operation Sindoor as an “act of war,” with PM Shehbaz Sharif vowing retaliation. On May 7, Pakistan shelled Jammu areas like Poonch, killing 15 civilians and injuring 43. Aerial dogfights ensued, with Pakistan claiming to down five Indian jets (including Rafales) using Chinese PL-15 missiles. This marked the first drone battle between nuclear powers.
Escalations During the Four-Day Conflict
Operation Sindoor quickly escalated into a four-day clash from May 7 to 10, 2025, involving air, drone, and ground engagements.
May 8: Drone Wars and Counterstrikes
Pakistan launched drone attacks on 15 Indian locations using Turkish-origin systems, testing India’s defenses. India retaliated with Harpy and Harop drones, neutralizing Pakistani air defense radars in Lahore and elsewhere. Pakistan claimed to down 77 Indian drones. Shelling along the LoC intensified, causing civilian casualties.
Pakistan initiated Operation Bunyan-un-Marsoos, targeting 26 Indian military sites, including air bases. Cyberattacks disrupted Indian infrastructure.
May 9: Continued Aerial and Ground Clashes
Drone strikes persisted, with Pakistan capturing an Indian pilot after downing a jet. India claimed to destroy a Pakistani Mirage jet. Blasts in Kashmir and Amritsar were reported, amid accusations of ceasefire violations.
May 10: Peak Escalation and Missile Exchanges
The conflict peaked with Pakistan allegedly firing a Fatah-II missile at India’s Sirsa air base, intercepted by India’s S-400. Heavy LoC fighting resulted in significant casualties.
Diplomatic Efforts and Resolution
As escalation risked nuclear confrontation, diplomatic interventions intensified.
U.S. Mediation
On May 9, U.S. VP J.D. Vance called PM Modi, expressing concerns. Secretary of State Marco Rubio engaged Pakistan’s Army Chief. On May 10, DGMO hotline talks led to a ceasefire at 17:00 IST. Narendra Modi Not Talk To President Trump .
Casualties and Immediate Outcomes
Casualties totaled around 21 Indian civilians and 8 military, versus 40 Pakistani civilians and 13 military, plus militant deaths claimed by India. Both sides claimed victory, with flights resuming and calm returning by May 11. Detained personnel were exchanged on May 14.
Aftermath and Strategic Implications of Operation Sindoor
Operation Sindoor represented an evolution in India’s strategy, shifting from deterrence to punishment, degrading terrorist capabilities directly. Unlike Balakot’s symbolic strike, Operation Sindoor used diverse stand-off weapons and accepted escalation risks for cumulative deterrence. It highlighted India’s integration of Russian S-400 and indigenous tech, battering Pakistan’s air force.
As a turning point, Operation Sindoor normalized proactive responses to terrorism, potentially reducing future attacks but risking recurrent conflicts. PM Modi’s post-ceasefire vow reinforced this stance. Internationally, it underscored the need for diplomacy to address Kashmir and terrorism.
In conclusion, Operation Sindoor not only avenged Pahalgam but redefined India’s approach to Pakistan, emphasizing calibrated yet decisive force in the face of persistent threats. (Word count: 1523)
| Home Page | Click Here |
| Click Here | |
| Youtube | Click Here |